Re: K.F.C. (U.K) V’s W.T.F. (U.S.A.) : Sun Mar 18, 2018 8:45 pm  

King Street Cat wrote:

Chicken breast - 162g - 207.3 calories

KFC extra crispy chicken breast - 162g - 460 calories

That's numberwang.

doesnt make it junk though, possibly calorific, but not junk.

But each to their own, give me kfc ober Sunday lunch listening to the likes of you anytime.

Re: K.F.C. (U.K) V’s W.T.F. (U.S.A.) : Tue Mar 20, 2018 12:21 pm  

PCollinson1990 wrote:

doesnt make it junk though, possibly calorific, but not junk.

But each to their own, give me kfc ober Sunday lunch listening to the likes of you anytime.

Of course its junk

Regards

King James

Re: K.F.C. (U.K) V’s W.T.F. (U.S.A.) : Tue Mar 20, 2018 12:41 pm  

Lebron James wrote:

Of course its junk

Regards

King James

still no explanation of why it's junk!

Re: K.F.C. (U.K) V’s W.T.F. (U.S.A.) : Tue Mar 20, 2018 7:33 pm  

PCollinson1990 wrote:

still no explanation of why it's junk!

Really? You have to have it explained to you why it’s junk? That’s a serious question by the way

Regards

King James

Re: K.F.C. (U.K) V’s W.T.F. (U.S.A.) : Wed Mar 21, 2018 8:04 am  

Lebron James wrote:

Really? You have to have it explained to you why it’s junk? That’s a serious question by the way

Regards

King James

Yes, in a serious respone, I do need it explaining, because it isn't junk in any, way, shape or form.

Calorific, yes

woukd you describe Fish and Chips as junk?

Re: K.F.C. (U.K) V’s W.T.F. (U.S.A.) : Wed Mar 21, 2018 12:55 pm  

PCollinson1990 wrote:

Yes, in a serious respone, I do need it explaining, because it isn't junk in any, way, shape or form.

Calorific, yes

woukd you describe Fish and Chips as junk?

You seem to be under the assumption that if you start with a healthy item of food, nothing you can do to it will make it unhealthy. That's simply not true.

The chicken breast itself isn't junk, but once it's been coated in a mixture of breadcrumbs and salt, then fried in oil, it becomes junk. In the case of KFC extra crispy, the 200+ extra calories added in the process are empty calories, (energy rich, nutrient poor) they offer nothing but flavour and texture.

Interesting you mention fish and chips. Out of all the fast foods, fish and chips is considered one of the most healthy, but the fish has to be VERY lightly battered, or better still unbattered. It's the batter that makes it a junk food.

Another good example is a toffee apple. An apple on it's own is a healthy snack, coat it in caramelised sugar and dip it in hundreds and thousands and it becomes junk food.

Re: K.F.C. (U.K) V’s W.T.F. (U.S.A.) : Wed Mar 21, 2018 12:57 pm  

PCollinson1990 wrote:

Yes, in a serious respone, I do need it explaining, because it isn't junk in any, way, shape or form.

Calorific, yes

woukd you describe Fish and Chips as junk?

The amount of saturated fat, salt, sodium and other additives that wreck your body, would put it in the junk food category

Regards

King James

Re: K.F.C. (U.K) V’s W.T.F. (U.S.A.) : Wed Mar 21, 2018 1:01 pm  

King Street Cat wrote:

You seem to be under the assumption that if you start with a healthy item of food, nothing you can do to it will make it unhealthy. That's simply not true.

The chicken breast itself isn't junk, but once it's been coated in a mixture of breadcrumbs and salt, then fried in oil, it becomes junk. In the case of KFC extra crispy, the 200+ extra calories added in the process are empty calories, (energy rich, nutrient poor) they offer nothing but flavour and texture.

Interesting you mention fish and chips. Out of all the fast foods, fish and chips is considered one of the most healthy, but the fish has to be VERY lightly battered, or better still unbattered. It's the batter that makes it a junk food.

Another good example is a toffee apple. An apple on it's own is a healthy snack, coat it in caramelised sugar and dip it in hundreds and thousands and it becomes junk food.

so, fish and chips?
toad in the hole
onion rings
chinese food
curry

it's a sad life you lead, I guess that's why they are called "salad days", wake up, extra calories are only bad if you don't burn them off.

Enjoy your lentil soup, washed down with herbal tea (both of which will have been fertilised bu the "output" of animals.

Happy Easter, snowflake, please feel free to leave us normal people alone...

Re: K.F.C. (U.K) V’s W.T.F. (U.S.A.) : Wed Mar 21, 2018 1:07 pm  

PCollinson1990 wrote:

so, fish and chips?
toad in the hole
onion rings
chinese food
curry

it's a sad life you lead, I guess that's why they are called "salad days", wake up, extra calories are only bad if you don't burn them off.

Enjoy your lentil soup, washed down with herbal tea (both of which will have been fertilised bu the "output" of animals.

Happy Easter, snowflake, please feel free to leave us normal people alone...

You are absolutely correct. He must lead a sad life based on his food of choice. Thats some astounding logic you have applied

Regards

King James

Re: K.F.C. (U.K) V’s W.T.F. (U.S.A.) : Wed Mar 21, 2018 1:20 pm  

[quote="Lebron James"]You are absolutely correct. He must lead a sad life based on his food of choice. Thats some astounding logic you have applied

Regards

źzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz