FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!

   WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions
::Off-topic discussion.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Administrator25122No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 05 200123 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
13th Jul 17 01:3911th May 17 20:59LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Aleph Green

Re: The Astronomy Thread : Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:17 pm  
Seriously, I don't understand some of you people. It's like you are fundamentally incapable of arriving at any conclusion without explicit authority to do so.

When industry insiders, whistleblowers, professional observes (i.e. fighter pilots and scientists performing seismic surveys on the US Western seaboard), directors of major defence contractors are ALL saying "I have seen craft or evidence of craft whose performance envelope is staggering" and those testimonies are found not to be contradictory there's more than a chance that they are telling the truth. A craft shaped like a "big black triangle" with lights at each vertex. A craft which can change direction around a coin at multiples of mach speed. A craft which makes almost no sound at all. A craft which can cloak itself within ambient colours. Time and time again we've seen highly credible observers make such statements. But you'd rather believe NASA, an overtly military operation largely created by former Nazi war criminals who should have been hung at Nuremberg which has repeatedly lied and falsified evidence since its inception than people who really have no vested interest in reporting their observations and have even had their careers harmed by doing so.

I find this possibility far more credible than the LUDICROUS notion that a nation spending TRILLIONS on defence is prepared to cede supremacy of space to expanding nation states such as China and beg Roscomos or Ariane for a lift into orbit following the retirement of the shuttle. Likewise, the idea that there has been almost no significant progress (other than the rarely deployed ion drive) in the field of space propulsion systems since prior to WWII.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Administrator25122No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 05 200123 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
13th Jul 17 01:3911th May 17 20:59LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Aleph Green

Re: The Astronomy Thread : Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:42 pm  
I'll list just a handful of the comments made by Ben Rich before his death:

"We did the F104, C130, U2, SR71, F117 and many other programs that I can't talk about. We are still working very hard, I just can't tell you what we are doing" (September 1992)

"The Air Force has just given us a contract to take ET back home" (September 22, 1992)"

"We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an Act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity" (UCLA 3/23/93)

"There is an error in the equations, and we have figured it out, and now know how to travel to the stars, and it won't take a lifetime to do it" (UCLA Alumni Speech 3/23/93)"

"Jim, we have things in the Nevada desert that are fifty years beyond what you can comprehend. If you've seen it on Star Wars or Star Trek, we have been there, done that, or decided it wasn't worth the effort" -- confirmed conversation with Jim Goodhall (a close friend of Rich) weeks prior to his passing in 1995.

Now, you tell me what you think the above means?
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Moderator31956
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 22 200123 years73rd
OnlineLast PostLast Page
22nd Nov 24 17:5622nd Nov 24 22:47LINK
Milestone Posts
30000
40000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
The Corridor of Uncertainty
Signature
"If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them," - Wayne Bennett.
Moderator

Re: The Astronomy Thread : Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:01 pm  
TheButcher wrote:
*Sigh*


X2
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman28357
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 17 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
2nd May 24 20:2424th Oct 19 15:32LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
MACS0647-JD
Signature
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:
I am a very experienced Photoshop user and the above is in my considered view conspiracist nonsense.

Mugwump wrote:
Nope, that's a loaded statement meant to browbeat independent thinking into quiescence.

Nope, it was a neutral and accurate statement meant to indictae that I consider myself able to comment on "Photoshopping" questions with as much validity as you did when you made the following loaded statement presumably meant to browbeat independent thinking into quiescence:
Mugwump wrote:
I also think that by red-shifting the atmosphere they also make it easier for those editing Mars images to clone out inconvenient artifacts without leaving the telltale traces that experienced Photoshop users can spot a mile off. I have attempted to clone the same portion of duplicate images and it is definitely harder to detect changes at a pixel level in the photograph which has been colour shifted into the red.

Mugwump wrote:
You should know by now that I attach a much higher degree of significance to my own opinions than yours (for a whole host of reasons) so I really don't know why you bothered typing it.

I neither know nor care what you think of my opinions. Take em or leave em. I typed it in answer to your claim, that much is surely obvious.
Mugwump wrote:
This is a gross misrepresentation and you know it. I don't know ANYONE, ANYWHERE who believes every single event taking place on this planet and others forms part of a "grand conspiracy". Likewise, I don't know ANYONE, ANYWHERE who believes conspiracy doesn't exist - full-stop. We ALL inhabit a region in-between both extremes.

Exaggeration for emphasis is a normal literary device and your comment therefore has no valid basis.
Mugwump wrote:
I mean, weren't YOU the guy who claimed the SL Challenge Cup draw is "rigged"?

Er - no, I debunked the "dodgy ball theory. (Using Photoshop). The precise opposite to what you oddly claim.
Mugwump wrote:
You do realise that a monolith is, BY DEFINITION, a "geological feature consisting of a single massive stone or rock". So you're discounting someone for pointing out "monoliths" on Mars when he is accurately describing the VERY THING YOU CLAIM HE ISN'T? This is what happens when people get their knowledge from movies ...

You can be irritatingly deisingenuous. You know full well that in context the suggestion by your mate and his school of thought is that the "Monolith on Mars" must be artificail not natural, so evidence of aliens or whatever, and he then implies that there's loads of 'em. There aren't. There is known to be just that one. And he is comparing long shadows from plainly natural rock objects, to the "Monolith", trying to make people think it is not the only artificial monolith "built" on Mars. As you well know.
Mugwump wrote:
Well, what do you propose? Stop all further missions? Bit suspicious, that - not to mention hard to justify. And as you know perfectly well, the system of government graft in the US is fundamentally wrapped up with the maxim "Use it or lose it".

Ah, so you DO think there is known life on Mars, and they've found it, but they have to keep spending untold billions continuing to send missions to "look for it" just so they don't "give the game away" by stopping missions because taht woudl "look suspicious". Okaaaaaay. Hmmm. Now my trolling detector is reaching amber levels.
Mugwump wrote:
...NASA is run by human beings just like the rest of us. They have the same hangups, are prone to making the same mistakes and are periodically bothered by the same naggings of conscience. You think a guy paid to sit in front of a PC all day editing images is any more honest and diligent just because he works for NASA?

No, most human beings working for NASA or elsewhere do not participate in the crazier conspiracy theories about alien life, aliens on Earth, fake Moon landings, no satellites exist, flat earth, and the rest. There MAY be the odd conspiracy loon within NASA and I suppose being such a big organisation statistically there is some likelihood but no, I believe that the overwhelming majority of them are likely to be like the overwhelming majority of other people - just doing their job, and not part of some ludicrous endless and infinitely expensive conspiracy involving hundreds of thousands of employees all over the globe 99.9% of which would I think roll their eyes and sigh at the sort of conspiracist shoite I am talking about.
Mugwump wrote:
On the contrary - colour reproduction is a VERY precise science. You are conflating colour PERCEPTION which is not the same thing.

No I am not at all. Colour can only be accurately reproduced if you are able to use a light source of precisely standard "white" and of a precisely calibrated brightness and at a precisely measured distance, and starting in total darkness. Anything else and you will get a variation from doing the exact same thing in different places. Whether you call it an error of perception or an error of reproduction will depend. It could be a bit of both.
Mugwump wrote:
No one is talking here about colour perception.

Wrong. All we CAN talk about is colour perception. Unless a human eye is seeing the image / object / and forming a judgment on it, which is perception, there is nothing to talk about, is there?
Mugwump wrote:
When I say it's IMPOSSIBLE for NASA to change their own colour calibration markers from blue to vivid red using only a colour cast transfer and still record an accurate colour rendition (under earth conditions) it's because it really is impossible...

Is there an actual point in there that you want to get out, that realtes to something specific?
Mugwump wrote:
We're talking about NASA's excuse for completely ignoring their own colour calibration procedure, imposing a seemingly arbitrary value and then offering an excuse which introduces a variable which we can't test and yet they knew of it before the mission was even launched. Did the scientists who designed the optical package and the calibration tests just FORGET about this dust?

What, specifically, are you referring to? Do you have a link to NASA's said "excuse"?
Mugwump wrote:
But there's a big difference between attempting to render non-visible radiation in false colour and FAKING images. I'm sure you can grasp the distinction.

Indeed I can, sadly many conspiracists on the planet absolutely can't. Which sad state of affairs has been going on ever since the first Moon landing "hoax" claims with their pseudo-scientific absolute bunkum about not being able to see the stars, diverging shadows, why is the dark side of teh lander illuminated and other such puerile objections, which are so asinine that to say they were "debunked" is to afford them 99% more credibility than they ever had - yet despite this, their legacy is that many people to this day ludicrously believe man never landed on the Moon.
Mugwump wrote:
Erm ... in case you didn't know science is and has never been about arguments from authority. If it were the church would still be running the whole show. The linked video provides EVIDENCE ...

As I said the trouble with the linked video is that the presenter reveals his conspiracist credentials as well as presenting grossly unscientific and misleading material. So I can't take anything he says seriously. I'm surprised you can.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman28357
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 17 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
2nd May 24 20:2424th Oct 19 15:32LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
MACS0647-JD
Signature
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total

Re: The Astronomy Thread : Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:07 pm  
Mugwump wrote:
I'll list just a handful of the comments made by Ben Rich before his death:

"We did the F104, C130, U2, SR71, F117 and many other programs that I can't talk about. We are still working very hard, I just can't tell you what we are doing" (September 1992)

"The Air Force has just given us a contract to take ET back home" (September 22, 1992)"

"We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an Act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity" (UCLA 3/23/93)

"There is an error in the equations, and we have figured it out, and now know how to travel to the stars, and it won't take a lifetime to do it" (UCLA Alumni Speech 3/23/93)"

"Jim, we have things in the Nevada desert that are fifty years beyond what you can comprehend. If you've seen it on Star Wars or Star Trek, we have been there, done that, or decided it wasn't worth the effort" -- confirmed conversation with Jim Goodhall (a close friend of Rich) weeks prior to his passing in 1995.

Now, you tell me what you think the above means?

If you asked me whether I believe that the Americans (or the Russians, Chinese or any other power capable of throwing sufficient resources at it) have in the past been and are currently spending a lot of money on top secret research into stuff like propulsion systems, advanced air/space craft etc., I would say well of bloody course they are, it would be ludicrous to think they weren't!

I would qualify my opinion with the strict caveat that we are not now nor ever have been in possession of technology from /contacted or visited by / aliens from other worlds and I consider anyone who claims to have been abducted, or seen aliens to be in need of help.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman28357
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 17 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
2nd May 24 20:2424th Oct 19 15:32LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
MACS0647-JD
Signature
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total

Re: The Astronomy Thread : Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:17 pm  
Mugwump wrote:
Seriously, I don't understand some of you people. It's like you are fundamentally incapable of arriving at any conclusion without explicit authority to do so.

When industry insiders, whistleblowers, professional observes (i.e. fighter pilots and scientists performing seismic surveys on the US Western seaboard), directors of major defence contractors are ALL saying "I have seen craft or evidence of craft whose performance envelope is staggering" and those testimonies are found not to be contradictory there's more than a chance that they are telling the truth.


I wouldn't discount that. As i said in my earlier reply, all advanced nations try to design better/stealthier/faster etc craft to gain an advantage, and so many of the sightings of "UFOs" that are genuine are indeed very likely to be advanced secret craft. I don't even see anything debatable on this point.

Have the Americans, and the Russians, got top secret advanced craft / weapons etc that I have never seen? Of bloody course they have. What WOULD be odd is if they had made all their latest assets public.

Mugwump wrote:
I find this possibility far more credible than the LUDICROUS notion that a nation spending TRILLIONS on defence is prepared to cede supremacy of space to expanding nation states such as China and beg Roscomos or Ariane for a lift into orbit following the retirement of the shuttle. Likewise, the idea that there has been almost no significant progress (other than the rarely deployed ion drive) in the field of space propulsion systems since prior to WWII.


Two points in one. I should imagine NASA has some contingency plan if it came down to it, maybe to unmothball a Space Shuttle or whatever, but no, I do NOT believe they have a secret space transit craft.

There has been a mammoth leap in space propulsion systems since WWII as any student of space an astronomy would know, and once out of Earth orbit, for example, we have ion drive, solar sails and the rest. But, to escape Earth's orbit, we have not yet perfected any means other than brute force.

Do i think we will ever create an "anti-gravity" device? Why not? Once we understand what gravity actually is, and how it works, then I don't see any reason in principle why we wouldn't find some smart way to alter its effects. And a warp drive seems eminently doable in theory, even if not, I think, in current practice.

I would be very surprised if the anti-gravity propulsion system had yet been invented but as I am sure that one day it will be, then the only question is whether that day has yet come. My guess would be within 50 years.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Administrator25122No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 05 200123 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
13th Jul 17 01:3911th May 17 20:59LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Aleph Green

Edgar Fouche's 1998 presentation on the TR-3B
Edgar Fouche's 1998 presentation on the TR-3B
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Administrator25122No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 05 200123 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
13th Jul 17 01:3911th May 17 20:59LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Aleph Green

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:
Is there an actual point in there that you want to get out, that realtes to something specific?
What, specifically, are you referring to? Do you have a link to NASA's said "excuse"?


Jesus H. Christ! Watch the bloody video. I'm sure as hell not going to spoon-feed it for you.

And what THE **** are you doing splitting off a conversation which is explicitly concerned with explaining OBSERVABLE ASTRONOMICAL PHENOMENA and then setting up a completely new thread with a blatantly loaded addendum?

Do you seriously think that's acceptable behavior from a moderator? In this short debate who of the two of us launched the first personal attack? When other members entered the debate with single-statement personal attacks which of the two of us took action? Who the **** do you think you are?

I really don't know what you are attempting to discuss in the existing thread ("the NASA appreciation society", "there is no truth but explicitly authorized state-sanctioned truth" maybe) but it certainly isn't doing what it says on the tin. Maybe you should remind people at the start of the thread not to mention Vladimir Putin or the Russian Space Industry given that Putin has openly questioned whether the US ever went to the moon. And I guess you'd better throw in the names of just about every astronaut in the US space program (including Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, Edgar Mitchell etc. etc.) who have openly talked about unidentified flying objects. I guess they are "conspiracy loons", too. Oh, and don't forget Dwight D. Eisenhower and Richard Nixon. Good lord - what an incredibly MONOTONOUS thread it must now be.

And you do realise that people such as Galileo, Copernicus & Isaac Newton would undoubtedly take umbrage with what YOU consider (and now define as) "astronomy". Although, maybe not. I can't say that I've ever considered you intellectually noteworthy so I guess you aren't capable of this level of thinking.

Mental Note: Don't waste your time on morons.
Wheels 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Owner18299
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 05 200321 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
18th Nov 24 13:029th Oct 24 15:59LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
YO31
Signature
@GavWilson
Moderator

Well, this escalated quickly.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman28357
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 17 200223 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
2nd May 24 20:2424th Oct 19 15:32LINK
Milestone Posts
25000
30000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
MACS0647-JD
Signature
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total

The Night Sky thread is nothing to do with conspiracy theories. He Sin Bin is almost dead but almost all of it is occupied with discussions about conspiracies. Those who want to discuss conspiracies should allow other threads to exist without dumping more of the same in them. It is 100% correct to split the new conspiracy stuff off a sit is NOTHING to do with the night sky thread. But tell you what, if you don't like it then merge the fscking thing back and I'll close the door on my way out. That will leave you as basically the lone poster in the entire Sin Bin which seems to be what you're aiming for.
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 156 guests

REPLY

Subject: 
Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...

Return to The Sin Bin


RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
28m
Shopping list for 2025
Cokey
5577
32m
Game - Song Titles
Cokey
40732
49m
Planning for next season
Cokey
176
Recent
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
MadDogg
4018
Recent
Film game
karetaker
5639
Recent
2025 Recruitment
Pyrah123
197
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
50s
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
tad rhino
2593
50s
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
homerjsimpso
14
58s
Pre Season - 2025
mwindass
183
1m
Castleford sack Lingard
FIL
8
1m
Assistant Coach - Langley
exiledrhino
30
2m
Shopping list for 2025
Cokey
5577
2m
Film game
karetaker
5639
3m
Fixtures 2025
UllFC
65
3m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
MadDogg
4018
3m
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
63221
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
2024
Butcher
5
TODAY
Dan Norman Retires
Cokey
1
TODAY
How many games will we win
Butcher
5
TODAY
Leigh Leopards - 2025 Fixtures
ColD
2
TODAY
Catalan Away
jonh
5
TODAY
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
2025 fixtures
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Fixtures
Willzay
13
TODAY
Salford
rubber ducki
12
TODAY
WCC Off
Choc Ice
11
TODAY
Leeds away first up
Butcher
41
TODAY
Jake McLoughlin
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Assistant Coach - Langley
exiledrhino
30
TODAY
Noah Booth out on loan
Butcher
20
TODAY
Luke Gale testimonial match
BarnsleyGull
2
TODAY
England 5 - 0 Ireland
Sadfish
1
TODAY
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To Newcastle
RLFANS News
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
2025 Betfred Super League Fixt..
460
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To N..
530
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
1271
England's Women Demolish The W..
1093
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
1334
Operational Rules Tribunal –..
1128
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
1392
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
1928
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
2145
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
2384
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
1957
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
2194
Hunslet Book Relegation Play O..
2659
Penrith Panthers Secure Fourth..
2091
Wigan Humiliate Leigh For Gran..
2163
RLFANS Match Centre
Matches on TV
Thu 13th Feb
SL
20:00
Wigan-Leigh
Fri 14th Feb
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Castleford
SL
20:00
Catalans-Hull FC
Sat 15th Feb
SL
15:00
Leeds - Wakefield
SL
17:30
St.Helens-Salford
Sun 16th Feb
SL
15:00
Huddersfield-Warrington
Thu 20th Feb
SL
20:00
Wakefield - Hull KR
Fri 21st Feb
SL
20:00
Warrington-Catalans
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Wigan
Sat 22nd Feb
SL
15:00
Salford-Leeds
SL
20:00
Castleford-St.Helens
Sun 23rd Feb
SL
14:30
Leigh-Huddersfield
Thu 6th Mar
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Leigh
Fri 7th Mar
SL
20:00
Castleford-Salford
SL
20:00
St.Helens-Hull KR
Sat 8th Mar
SL
17:30
Catalans-Leeds
Sun 9th Mar
SL
17:30
Warrington - Wakefield
SL
17:30
Wigan-Huddersfield
Thu 20th Mar
SL
20:00
Salford-Huddersfield
Fri 21st Mar
SL
20:00
St.Helens-Warrington
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
28m
Shopping list for 2025
Cokey
5577
32m
Game - Song Titles
Cokey
40732
49m
Planning for next season
Cokey
176
Recent
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
MadDogg
4018
Recent
Film game
karetaker
5639
Recent
2025 Recruitment
Pyrah123
197
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
50s
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
tad rhino
2593
50s
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
homerjsimpso
14
58s
Pre Season - 2025
mwindass
183
1m
Castleford sack Lingard
FIL
8
1m
Assistant Coach - Langley
exiledrhino
30
2m
Shopping list for 2025
Cokey
5577
2m
Film game
karetaker
5639
3m
Fixtures 2025
UllFC
65
3m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
MadDogg
4018
3m
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
63221
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
2024
Butcher
5
TODAY
Dan Norman Retires
Cokey
1
TODAY
How many games will we win
Butcher
5
TODAY
Leigh Leopards - 2025 Fixtures
ColD
2
TODAY
Catalan Away
jonh
5
TODAY
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
2025 fixtures
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Fixtures
Willzay
13
TODAY
Salford
rubber ducki
12
TODAY
WCC Off
Choc Ice
11
TODAY
Leeds away first up
Butcher
41
TODAY
Jake McLoughlin
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Assistant Coach - Langley
exiledrhino
30
TODAY
Noah Booth out on loan
Butcher
20
TODAY
Luke Gale testimonial match
BarnsleyGull
2
TODAY
England 5 - 0 Ireland
Sadfish
1
TODAY
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To Newcastle
RLFANS News
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
2025 Betfred Super League Fixt..
460
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To N..
530
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
1271
England's Women Demolish The W..
1093
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
1334
Operational Rules Tribunal –..
1128
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
1392
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
1928
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
2145
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
2384
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
1957
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
2194
Hunslet Book Relegation Play O..
2659
Penrith Panthers Secure Fourth..
2091
Wigan Humiliate Leigh For Gran..
2163


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!