Horatio Yed wrote:
I'm not saying i agree with invading countries based on jumped up motives, but to say that the cannon fodder that go over don't go over with honourable intentions is a bit dismissive, i have friends over there and they try their best even if they don't want to be there.
I haven't suggested that., HY.
Service personnel go out there because they're told to, but I'm sure that there's a wide range of personal feelings about doing that amongst them. And I wouldn't suggest others – and didn't.
But regardless of that, I would question how much has been achieved – and it's certainly not down to the ordinary soldiers to do the political/diplomatic stuff (what I touched on above).
Chris28 wrote:
I hope you're right, but can't see it tbh.
Me neither.
vbfg wrote:
I don't want to be disrespectful to those people at all, but their best intentions don't count for squat. How they are perceived in that country, and the concrete results of their presence and actions are what count...
Indeed.