Dally wrote:
They are about breaking up national, unionised monopolies, which can disrupt democracy.
I fail to see how elected politicians abdicating their responsibilities to the private sector (as is the case with the utilities and rail already and will be soon with health, education and policing) is anything but a huge disruption of democracy.
Dally wrote:
In this case they will also be a way, over time, of reducing the unreasonable cost of pension provision relative to the overall police budget.
What level is unreasonable? There was a new pension scheme introduced by the wasteful, tax & spend crazy Labour government that significantly reduced the pension available in the Police.
Dally wrote:
From these perspectives, breaking up these sort of organisations makes sense. From the publics point of view, like rail privatisation, they will be a retrograde step.
No they don't make sense to anyone except the shareholders and senior management of a few private companies who will make millions if not billions of profit.
To the public it is yet another public service being privatised and as we all know when public services are privatised, the poorest in society are hit hardest. I would expect nothing less from a Conservative government.