RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
22 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!
WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Tony Clubb - Charged Grade F
::Off-topic discussion.
Re: Tony Clubb - Charged Grade F Thu May 13, 2021 4:11 pm  

Jason65 wrote:
Jason65 Stevo's Armpit

Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2020 4:38 pm
Posts: 51
the mere sight of people with colour do not upset me,so i do not have issues.thanks for you concern.
Re: Tony Clubb - Charged Grade F Thu May 13, 2021 4:23 pm  
Ornery Optimist Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2014 6:51 pm
Posts: 5231
The Ghost of '99 wrote:
Were the white skinned people complaining when people of other backgrounds were under represented on tv?

It's a thorny subject but I do wonder if, when the sight of black or Asian people on tv makes some people upset, they might just perhaps be racist.


For many decades,or longer,females have been under represented in lots of walks of life,and in senior positions.
The Suffragettes may have taken to a little direct action,but in recent decades the females have taken significant steps without rioting,or starting/joining extreme political movements.

In an ideal world appointing the best individuals to jobs would be ideal.

Unfortunately it ain't an ideal world,and it seems all races have racists amongst them.
No reserves,but resilience,persistence and determination are omnipotent.
Re: Tony Clubb - Charged Grade F Thu May 13, 2021 5:33 pm  
The Ghost of '99 User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 4:45 pm
Posts: 1782
Location: Desperation Island
Ornery Optimist wrote:
For many decades,or longer,females have been under represented in lots of walks of life,and in senior positions.
The Suffragettes may have taken to a little direct action,but in recent decades the females have taken significant steps without rioting,or starting/joining extreme political movements.

In an ideal world appointing the best individuals to jobs would be ideal.

Unfortunately it ain't an ideal world,and it seems all races have racists amongst them.

Ahh LOL, you're going with the it's an "extremist organisation" reason for not supporting racial equality. Gotcha.
"Brian McDermott, with a wry smile, nods when asked if he remembers a specific incident which made him realise he was a prick. 'I do', he murmurs."
Re: Tony Clubb - Charged Grade F Thu May 13, 2021 6:26 pm  
Ornery Optimist Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2014 6:51 pm
Posts: 5231
The Ghost of '99 wrote:
Ahh LOL, you're going with the it's an "extremist organisation" reason for not supporting racial equality. Gotcha.



I support racial equality - or,at least I am fully against racial prejudice.
I reckon I have more credentials in that aspect than most,if not all,in this country.
What drew you to your conclusion that I don't support racial equality?
I am totally against BLM - Warrington for supporting them,and a Leigh player for believing those ' athletes ' and putting them as his reason for supporting them when they set-up the police.
As a white person I would admit my misanthropy,is mainly against white people.
I await my day in court for my prejudice/racism against white people.
There again,if I was in a position of deciding employment,I would NOTprejudice against a white skinned person.I would recruit the person at the time.
Lots of things I would like - but ain't qualified and I know I wouldn't get it.
No reserves,but resilience,persistence and determination are omnipotent.
Re: Tony Clubb - Charged Grade F Fri May 14, 2021 7:18 am  

Jason65 wrote:
Jason65 Stevo's Armpit

Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2020 4:38 pm
Posts: 51
Most right thinking people agree totally with racial equality and are against any form of bullying/bias etc but not to the detriment of the majority be it white/black/green purple etc.
Re: Tony Clubb - Charged Grade F Fri May 14, 2021 9:19 am  

Zoo Zoo Boom wrote:
Zoo Zoo Boom Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2020 9:38 am
Posts: 364
Most normal people would agree that discrimination of any type is not acceptable and that includes positive discrimination. All female candidate lists, all male clubs etc. Anyone who thinks BLM are on some kind of higher theoretical level are deluded, they are no better than Tommy Robinson's mob.
Re: Tony Clubb - Charged Grade F Fri May 14, 2021 11:05 am  

ninearches wrote:
ninearches Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 4:01 pm
Posts: 4566
Location: newton-le-willows

Zoo Zoo Boom wrote:
Most normal people would agree that discrimination of any type is not acceptable and that includes positive discrimination. All female candidate lists, all male clubs etc. Anyone who thinks BLM are on some kind of higher theoretical level are deluded, they are no better than Tommy Robinson's mob.


Unfortunately, positive discrimination actually dilutes any talent pool & doesn't do favours to anybody. All lives should matter & it is only extremists on all sides of the political spectrum who foster negative attitudes.
Re: Tony Clubb - Charged Grade F Mon May 17, 2021 8:24 pm  

User avataratomic wrote:
atomic User avatar
100% League Network
100% League Network

Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2015 6:07 pm
Posts: 6453
Zoo Zoo Boom wrote:
Most normal people would agree that discrimination of any type is not acceptable and that includes positive discrimination. All female candidate lists, all male clubs etc. Anyone who thinks BLM are on some kind of higher theoretical level are deluded, they are no better than Tommy Robinson's mob.


Discrimination isn’t a question here. Racial discrimination is. Can we keep on topic please.
Image
Re: Tony Clubb - Charged Grade F Wed May 19, 2021 11:43 am  

Zoo Zoo Boom wrote:
Zoo Zoo Boom Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2020 9:38 am
Posts: 364
atomic wrote:
Discrimination isn’t a question here. Racial discrimination is. Can we keep on topic please.


Wow - touchy, there isn't a thread on here that doesn't evolve in covering many closely related topics.

Could I ask why you are trying to keep this thread to its narrow title and you haven't stepped in to any of the others?

Would you class what happened to the teacher in Batley as racial discrimination?
Re: Tony Clubb - Charged Grade F Thu May 20, 2021 12:41 am  

User avataratomic wrote:
atomic User avatar
100% League Network
100% League Network

Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2015 6:07 pm
Posts: 6453
Zoo Zoo Boom wrote:
Wow - touchy, there isn't a thread on here that doesn't evolve in covering many closely related topics.

Could I ask why you are trying to keep this thread to its narrow title and you haven't stepped in to any of the others?

Would you class what happened to the teacher in Batley as racial discrimination?


I contain my comments within the topic of the thread. I suggest you do the same.
Image
Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guests

Quick Reply



Subject:
Message:

   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.

Return to The Sin Bin


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORDTEAM
5,169,5151,13078,6306,308LOGIN
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
YOU HAVE RL CHAT OFF
RLFANS Match Centre
Fri 18th Jun
NRL RND: 15 NQL Cowboys24-26Cronulla
NRL RND: 15 Penrith32-18Sydney
SL RND: 10 Huddersfield8-9Salford
SL RND: 10 Wigan8-18Hull KR
Thu 17th Jun
NRL RND: 15 Brisbane0-46Souths
SL RND: 10 St.Helens2-6Warrington
Wed 16th Jun
SLRND: 10 Wakefield12-18Castleford
Mon 14th Jun
NRL RND: 14 Canterbury28-6St.George
Sun 13th Jun
WSL RND: 5 Hudds W8-44Wire W
NRL RND: 14 NZ Warriors16-42Melbourne
NRL RND: 14 Parramatta40-12Wests
CH RND: 9 Dewsbury12-56Toulouse
CH RND: 9 Featherstone44-0Bradford
CH RND: 9 Halifax30-6York
CH RND: 9 Swinton30-36Newcastle
CH RND: 9 Whitehaven20-24Batley
CH RND: 9 Widnes22-24LondonB
L1 RND: 6 Coventry12-30Workington
L1 RND: 6 Keighley70-12West Wales
L1 RND: 6 Crusaders0-68Doncaster
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
National Rugby League 2021 ROUND : 14
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Melbourne 14 472 178 294 24
Penrith 14 418 133 285 24
Parramatta 14 400 224 176 22
Souths 13 341 282 59 20
Sydney 13 379 223 156 18
Manly 13 315 282 33 14
 
St.George 14 299 312 -13 12
NQL Cowboys 13 264 383 -119 12
Cronulla 13 244 298 -54 10
Gold Coast 14 318 380 -62 10
Canberra 13 257 321 -64 10
NZ Warriors 13 281 347 -66 10
Wests 14 292 374 -82 10
Newcastle 14 231 366 -135 10
Brisbane 14 232 436 -204 6
Canterbury 13 162 366 -204 4
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred Super League XXVI ROUND : 10
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Catalans 9 268 142 126 16 188.73 88.89
St.Helens 9 208 76 132 14 273.68 77.78
Wigan 9 166 154 12 14 107.79 77.78
Warrington 10 308 159 149 15 193.71 75
Hull FC 9 179 143 36 11 125.17 61.11
Hull KR 10 241 212 29 12 113.68 60
 
Castleford 10 203 244 -41 10 83.20 50
Leeds 8 150 136 14 6 110.29 37.50
Huddersfield 9 158 171 -13 6 92.40 33.33
Wakefield 10 175 249 -74 4 70.28 20
Salford 10 115 297 -182 4 38.72 20
Leigh 9 134 322 -188 0 41.61 0
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred Championship 2021 ROUND : 10
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Toulouse 7 347 70 277 14 495.71 100
Featherstone 8 306 76 230 16 402.63 100
Bradford 9 228 216 12 14 105.56 77.78
Batley 8 228 160 68 12 142.50 75
LondonB 9 226 216 10 11 104.63 61.11
Halifax 9 271 135 136 10 200.74 55.56
 
York 9 219 180 39 8 121.67 44.44
Sheffield 9 211 249 -38 8 84.74 44.44
Widnes 9 226 263 -37 7 85.93 38.89
Dewsbury 8 115 227 -112 6 50.66 37.50
Newcastle 8 168 246 -78 5 68.29 31.25
Whitehaven 9 160 278 -118 5 57.55 27.78
Oldham 9 134 330 -196 4 40.61 22.22
Swinton 9 152 345 -193 0 44.06 0
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred League One 2021 ROUND : 6
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
Barrow 6 251 66 185 12 380.30 100
Doncaster 6 250 126 124 10 198.41 83.33
Workington 6 210 106 104 10 198.11 83.33
Keighley 6 228 147 81 6 155.10 50
Hunslet 6 146 147 -1 6 99.32 50
Coventry 5 118 144 -26 4 81.94 40
 
Rochdale 6 161 196 -35 4 82.14 33.33
Crusaders 6 122 218 -96 4 55.96 33.33
LondonS 5 114 212 -98 2 53.77 20
West Wales 6 82 320 -238 0 25.63 0
This is an inplay table and positions can change as matches are in play.
Betfred Womens Super League 2021 ROUND : 6
 PLDFADIFFPTSDIFFWP%
St.HelensW 3 230 6 224 6 3,833.33 100
LeedsW 3 214 22 192 6 972.73 100
WiganW 3 158 18 140 6 877.78 100
CastlefordW 3 104 24 80 6 433.33 100
YorkW 3 76 102 -26 2 74.51 33.33
Wire W 4 86 154 -68 2 55.84 25
 
FeatherstoneW 4 74 164 -90 2 45.12 25
BradfordW 4 60 180 -120 2 33.33 25
Hudds W 4 46 222 -176 2 20.72 25
WakefieldW 3 16 172 -156 0 9.30 0
RLFANS Recent Posts




X