I don't use Twitter or Facebook and I probably never will. I see no reason to tweet my every waking action or be the first to get a comment read out by Fern Cotton after she plays a new track by Jessie J on radio 1 (the speed that these come in must mean that super keen teens are writing them before the track has even started). I'm not a technophobe and I keep up with stuff, but I do like being private.
I limit myself to naming my persona after a former Leeds players facial hair, having a picture of A fictional newsreader as my "avatar" and having arguments with people who have nothing in common other than they all have silly names and somewhere support a rugby league team.
enjoying the fresh air,moors and beaches of devon and cornwall
Signature
"He is your friend, your partner, your defender, your dog. You are his life, his love, his leader. He will be yours, faithful and true, to the last beat of his heart. You owe it to him to be worthy of such devotion" – -- Unknown
i only have a cheap phone, not one of those new fangled machines so i cant twitter even if i wanted to. i dont do facebook either. my life is no poorer for not doing them.
The only reason I post on here during the day is because my employer doesn't know the user name
I don't Facebook or Tweet or even update my blog during working hours because they all know who I am on those sites, indeed most of our staff are in the company workgroup, you'd need to be crazy to be sat at your desk tweeting during working hours and expect the MD not to be able trace you.
You don't feel that your signature on here kinda gives the game away?
AT THE RIPPINGHAM GALLERY .................................................................... ART PROFILE ................................................................... On Twitter ................................................................... On Facebook ...................................................................
Don't think they aren't reading your tweets either - there is incontrovertible evidence that they are.
Take the case of Leigh Van Bryan, who, looking forward to his U.S. holiday with his mate, tweeted He and his friend Emily Bunting were apprehended on arrival at Los Angeles International Airport before being sent home. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16810312
Spammers can do it, so I have no doubt governments can. Had a tweet from a Jesus spammer as I'd put "Jesus wept" in one tweet. I put "Macbook" in another and had spammers offering me Macbooks. Not quite sure where the porn ones come from though
Ferocious Aardvark wrote:
Don't think they aren't reading your tweets either - there is incontrovertible evidence that they are.
Take the case of Leigh Van Bryan, who, looking forward to his U.S. holiday with his mate, tweeted He and his friend Emily Bunting were apprehended on arrival at Los Angeles International Airport before being sent home. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16810312
Spammers can do it, so I have no doubt governments can. Had a tweet from a Jesus spammer as I'd put "Jesus wept" in one tweet. I put "Macbook" in another and had spammers offering me Macbooks. Not quite sure where the porn ones come from though
You do have the option to protect your tweets so only people approved by you can read them. I have never identified my employer, nor do I tweet about work. Although I don't specifically hide my identity either.
It amazes me how many people do bitch about work though.