Hope the club saw that, and invite him and a few cameras down to visit and see all the extra work that is going on behind the scenes with the new ownership.

Not that Sky would ever show a positive Wakey piece, mind, but it would be nice to see!

Add to this 2004 narrowly losing to Wigoon deep into the play offs and i dont think we have been too bad whilst constantly having to sell our key players (Ellis, Solo, Brough, Atkins) and having one of the lowest caps in the league. Yes we have been poor in certain areas in the past, but in some (and the most important one ie on the field) we have been competative and better than some teams (i hate to say but i think Salford have done little for SL).

You read my mind.

Widnes league spots haven't been great but we have reached two cup finals, been remarkable off the field and in academy too.

Salford should be favourites (BEFORE admin) but they have Manchester which is why not even mentioned. Must admit had forgot of Wakey's 5th place 2009 finish (going back to '04 defeats the object) and as said is equal to Cas and still hits the old '8th place' marker.

It's a sad situation but all clubs were happy to vote for it and block off Championship clubs. So if those clubs don't do anything to improve them as a club what can they expect to happen?

I thought clarke's remarks on boots and all last night were disgraceful

If wakey don't get a franchise then the rfl want shooting

Excellent club with excellent support

Last 3 years table finishes-
Trinity - 8,5,10 - Avg 8
Cas - 12,7,9 - Avg 9.3
Cat - 3,8,14 - Avg 8.3
Harl - 9,11,13 - Avg 11
Hull - 11,12,6 - Avg 9.6
It's interesting to see on average Trinity are far from the bottom. So as far as I can see, on field performance is something they can't knock us on.